This contempt petition was disposed of as not pressed. The court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge a District Magistrate's order in compliance with an earlier court direction.
Disposal of the contempt petition as not pressed, with liberty to challenge the impugned order later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3185 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3282 of 2018
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court MJC No.3185 of 2018(5) dt.22-01-2020 2/2
... ... Opposite Party/s
Aurangabad, Bihar.
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr.Leelawati Kumari For the State : Ms. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands disposed of as not pressed, however, with the aforesaid liberty.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
ajay gupta/- U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned counsel for the petitioners will seek liberty to challenge the impugned order of the District Magistrate in compliance of this Court's earlier order.
Bideshi Paswan and 12 others
The State Of Bihar
Sri Amir Subham
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
