Dismissed

Santosh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2020CR. MISC./3853/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous petition challenging apprehension of arrest was dismissed as not maintainable since illicit liquor was recovered from the petitioner's shop, invoking the statutory bar under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as not maintainable under Section 76(2); petitioner directed to surrender within four weeks for bail consideration.

Santosh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3853 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-437 Year-2019 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANTOSH KUMAR S/o - Krishna Prasad Resident of Wazirganj Bazar, P.S.Wazirganj, Distt- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 21-01-2020

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 437 of 2019 for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

The allegation is regarding recovery of nine litres of illicit liquor from the shop of the petitioner.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is having a clean antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not responsible for the recovery of the illicit liquor inasmuch as the shop in question is an open place where several customers visit for purchase of medicines all through

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3853 of 2020(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2

¶17

the day.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that since the recovery of illicit liquor has been made from the shop of the petitioner, the bar under Section 76 sub-clause (2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 shall come into play and consequently, the present petition is not maintainable, hence the same is dismissed. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the learned court of Special Excise Judge, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 437 of 2019, shall consider the bail application of the petitioner and dispose off the same on the very same day considering the fact that trivial quantity of liquor has been recovered from the shop of the petitioner.

¶19

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed off.

¶20

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶21

S.Sb/-

¶22

U T

Santosh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishore Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Champa Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Kavindra Kohar @ Kavindra Kumhar Vs The State of Bihar

Gajendra Kumar @ Golu @ Golu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bijay Sah Vs The State of Bihar