The High Court of Judicature at Patna allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition due to a fresh cause of action, dispossing the matter with liberty to approach the appropriate authority for redressal.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; liberty to move appropriate authority for redressal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9253 of 2017
======================================================
Nasimuddin son of Mohammad Moinuddin, resident of Village- Dangraha, P.O.- Mohmadia, P.S.- Kasba, District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Jha-Gp27 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 24-01-2020 Heard both sides.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition as the petitioner has got fresh cause of action after issuance of Annexure-6 series. Prayer is allowed.
This writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move before the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance.
BKS/-
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
U
Nasimuddin son of Mohammad Moinuddin
State Of Bihar
Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
District Magistrate, Katihar
District Education Officer, Katihar
District Programme Officer Establishment, Katihar
Prabhath Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
