The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the appeal it was based upon (Forest Appeal No. 32 of 2017) had already been disposed of. The petitioner had not appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4966 of 2017
======================================================
Amrendra Kumar Singh
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Gajendra Pd. Yadav-Sc17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
3 23-01-2020 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
The learned counsel for the State submits that Forest
Appeal No. 32 of 2017 has already been disposed of and this writ petition has become infructuous.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as has become infructuous.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
BKS/-
U
Amrendra Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
