The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the underlying Forest Confiscation Appeal was already dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5798 of 2017
======================================================
Santosh Kumar Singh, son of Bishwanath Singh, resident of villageHabbupur, Police Station-Rajpur, District-Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sarvesh Kr. Singh- AAG13 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 22-01-2020 Heard both sides.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous as the Forest Confiscation Appeal No.9 of 2017 has already been dismissed.
Having considered the facts, this writ petition is
dismissed as has become infructuous.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
Saurabh/-
U
Santosh Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram
The Divisional Forest Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
