Allowed

Md. Umar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Oct 2020CR. MISC./9980/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences and alleged land dispute. The order requires them to surrender within six weeks and furnish bail bonds with sureties to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each with two sureties of like amount, to surrender within six weeks.

Md. Umar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9980 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2019 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. UMAR, Son of Late Mainuddin,

¶5

Md. Mannan, Son of Iliyas,

¶6

Abbas @ Md. Abbas, Son of Late Mainuddin, All are Residents of Village - Dharhara, Sahebganj, Madhura South, P.S.Narpatganj, Distt.- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

6 13-10-2020

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceedings.

¶19

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 341, 323, 325, 307, 354, 380, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

Allegation against accused persons including the petitioners is of assaulting the informant and his family members and also took away ornaments and cash Rs.80,000/-.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. There is case and counter case between

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9980 of 2020(6) dt.13-10-2020 2/2

¶23

the parties. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. He further submits that injury reports are simple in nature. The informant and others have granted bail by the court below itself.

¶24

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail

¶25

petition.

¶26

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Narpatganj P. S. Case No. 337 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶27

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶28

amitkumar/-

¶29

U T

Md. Umar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Umar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Mishra @ Mithilesh Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Ram Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Hari Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mantosh Kumar Singh @ Maitosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar