Allowed

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah @ Mukesh Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Mar 2020CR. MISC./9092/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving an offence under Section 394 IPC. The petitioner, not named in the FIR, was released on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Relief on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. at Chapra.

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah @ Mukesh Kumar Sah Vs The State of… — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9092 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2019 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH SAH @ MUKESH KUMAR SAH, aged about 25 years, Male, Son of Bhola Sah, Resident of Village - Medhuka, P.S.Sahajitpur, Distt - Saran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Sachida Nand Rai, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr.Madan Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 05-03-2020

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence registered under Section 394 of the IPC.

¶15

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 09.05.2019 at about 10.00 P.M. the informant was going to his work place at Village-Baniyapur by his Motorcycle in the meanwhile, criminals on two Motorcycles surrounded him and attacked on him by knife due to which he sustained injuries on his arm and they snatched his Motorcycle and fled away.

¶16

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 12.07.2019. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9092 of 2020(2) dt.05-03-2020 2/2

¶18

Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name has come in the present case on his self confession made before the police. There is no recovery from possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put on T. I. Parade.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.Ist, Saran at Chapra in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 65 of 2019.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

U.K./- U T

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah @ Mukesh Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah @ Mukesh Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harichand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Ramu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar @ Batohi Vs The State of Bihar