The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a complaint case alleging cruelty under Sections 498A and 406 IPC and provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on conditions of furnishing bonds and sureties.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of like amount each with the SDM, Gopalganj.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74452 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-688 Year-2013 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj
======================================================
RAJENDRA SAH S/o Gopichand Sah @ Gopi Sah R/o village- Haluar Pipra, P.S.- Sidhwalia, District- Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mohammad Sufyan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umanath Mishra ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 05-03-2020
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, O.P. No. 2 and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 19-09-2019. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner undertakes that he will cooperate during trial. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74452 of 2019(3) dt.05-03-2020 2/2
petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 688 of 2013, Tr. No. 738 of 2019.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
A.K.V.//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be granted bail in the present complaint case on furnishing bail bonds and sureties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of BiharRelied on¶18
2006(3) PLJR 182
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajendra Sah
The State of Bihar
Sangita Devi
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
