Allowed

Vivek Kumar @ Batohi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Mar 2020CR. MISC./12779/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a case regarding recovery of a pistol and four live cartridges. The court ordered release upon furnishing a bail bond with two sureties, noting allegations of false implication and lack of compliance with Section 100 CrPC by the State.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing an amount of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of Sri Junaid Alam, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Begusarai.

Vivek Kumar @ Batohi Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12779 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2019 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIVEK KUMAR @ BATOHI Son of Ram Prakash Singh Resident of Village - Ramdiri Tola, Akashpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandan Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Renu Kumari ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 05-03-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1-B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶14

Allegation is that one country made pistol along with four live cartridges are recovered.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 8.9.2019. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. One country made pistol along with four live cartridges are said to have been recovered. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶16

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12779 of 2020(2) dt.05-03-2020 2/2

¶18

petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Junaid Alam, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st class, Begusarai in connection with Matihani P.S. case No.140 of 2019.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

¶22

U T

Vivek Kumar @ Batohi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Kumar @ Batohi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harichand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Ramu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah @ Mukesh Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar