Allowed

Hare Ram Sah @ Bengali Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jan 2020CR. MISC./87351/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application arising from the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, the court granted bail to the petitioner on ₹10,000 with two sureties, acknowledging allegations of improper recovery attribution and noting the petitioner's clean antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Ordering petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Hare Ram Sah @ Bengali Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87351 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2019 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Hare Ram Sah @ Bengali Sah, Son of Shri Kishun Sah, Resident of Village - Tajpur, P.S.- Manjhi, Distt - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amarendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-01-2020

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶14

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶15

The petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2019 in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No.198 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 30, 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recoveries were from beside the hotel of the present petitioner, but intentionally recovery has been saddled on the shoulders of the petitioner by showing that the recovery was from the petitioner’s house. It is further submitted that the alleged recoveries were not in his presence and the petitioner has nothing to do with the same.

¶17

Considering the aforementioned facts and

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87351 of 2019(2) dt.20-01-2020 2/2

¶19

circumstances and that the petitioner has clean antecedents, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J. 2^nd Cum Special Judge, Excise, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No.198 of 2019.

¶20

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶21

PNM

¶22

U T

Hare Ram Sah @ Bengali Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hare Ram Sah @ Bengali Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Soni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ranju Kumari @ Ranju Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Satendra Kumar @ Satendra Sao Vs the State of Bihar