Allowed

Anil Ray v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jan 2020CR. MISC./1135/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an instant bail petition, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioners charged under Section 414 IPC and Section 30(a)(g) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, noting that the alleged recover were not from their conscious possession.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount to the Special Judge, Excise, Patna.

Anil Ray Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1135 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2019 Thana- SALIMPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ANIL RAY Son of Harindra Ray Resident of Village-Bishunpur (Bhagtai Tola), P.S.-Bittupur, District-Vaishali.

¶5

Raju Kumar Son of Pachu Ray Resident of Village-Bishunpur (Bhagtai Tola), P.S.-Bittupur, District-Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-01-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

The petitioners are in custody since 27.01.2019 in connection with Special Case No.10577 of 2019, arising out of Salimpur P.S. Case No.245 of 2019 registered for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) (g)of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged recoveries were not from the conscious possession of the petitioners but from near Gyaspur Pipa bridge and that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Considering the aforementioned facts and

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1135 of 2020(2) dt.20-01-2020 2/2

¶18

circumstances and that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Special Case No.10577 of 2019, arising out of Salimpur P.S. Case No.245 of 2019.

¶19

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶20

amit/-

¶21

U T

Anil Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Soni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ranju Kumari @ Ranju Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hare Ram Sah @ Bengali Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Satendra Kumar @ Satendra Sao Vs the State of Bihar