Dismissed

Sanjit Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Mar 2020CR. MISC./84604/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna rejected an application for regular bail by the petitioner, who is in custody for alleged assault, abandonment, and attempt to murder, citing the injured victim's statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. as a significant consideration against granting bail at that stage.

What did the court decide?

Application for regular bail rejected; petitioner permitted to renew the prayer after six months.

Sanjit Paswan Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84604 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2019 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJIT PASWAN S/O- Late Mahendra Paswan Resident of Village - Bhojpatti, P.S.- Sarai, District - Vaishali.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 16-03-2020

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

The instant application for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No.342 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

As per allegation in the F.I.R., it is stated by the informant that his brother, who was coming home disappeared and his mobile phone was also found to be switched off. It subsequently transpired that some persons had left one person in an abandoned condition who had been taken by the police to the Sadar Hospital. On reaching the hospital, the informant found his brother unconscious. He was referred to the P.M.C.H., Patna. It subsequently transpired that the seven named accused persons

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84604 of 2019(3) dt.16-03-2020 2/3

¶13

including the petitioner herein had assaulted his brother with lathi, danda etc. and had abandoned him thinking him to be dead.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no motive has been assigned in the F.I.R. No specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner and admittedly the informant is not an eyewitness to the occurrence. The informant also does not state his source of knowledge of coming to know about the manner of occurrence. It is finally submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 25.09.2019.

¶15

On perusal of the case diary, it transpires that the statement of the injured brother of the informant was recorded. The injured has taken the name of this petitioner in course of his statement under section 161 of the Cr.P.C.

¶16

The application for bail has been opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, specially in view of the statement of the injured brother of the informant under section 161 of Cr.P.C., the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and as such the application for regular bail

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84604 of 2019(3) dt.16-03-2020 3/3

¶19

is rejected.

¶20

However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, if

¶21

so advised, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months.

¶22

(Partha Sarthy, J.)

¶23

amit/- U T

Sanjit Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjit Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sugriv Yadav @ Sugriv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Narmadeshwar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Yadav @ Shashi Kumar @ Guddu Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Krishan Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Deo Kumar Mahto @ Deo Kumar @ Mia @ Deo Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Sah Vs The State of Bihar