Partly allowed

Sugriv Yadav @ Sugriv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Mar 2020CR. MISC./3401/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case involving theft and cheating. The petitioner was directed to surrender within six weeks and furnish a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlarged on bail conditioned on surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties to the S.D.J.M., Jehanabad.

Sugriv Yadav @ Sugriv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3401 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2019 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUGRIV YADAV @ SUGRIV KUMAR S/o Gorelal Yadav R/o villageUttimpur, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶14

ORAL ORDER 2 06-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No.171 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under sections 414, 467, 468, 471 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per the allegation in the F.I.R., several accused persons were caught and it was discovered that they were dealing in stolen motorcycles. One of the person, who was caught disclosed that he has sold one of the stolen motorcycle to this petitioner.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused made before the police. Contrary to the allegation made and the seizure list, no incriminating article

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3401 of 2020(2) dt.06-03-2020 2/2

¶19

nor any motorcycle has been recovered from his possession. Referring to the seizure list, it is submitted that one of the witness to the seizure list happens to be Rajendra Paswan, who is the father of the accused Nitish Kumar, on whose confessional statement made before the police, the name of the petitioner has transpired. It is finally submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶20

The application for bail has been opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No.171 of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Partha Sarthy, J.)

¶23

amit/- U T

Sugriv Yadav @ Sugriv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sugriv Yadav @ Sugriv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Ballam Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Rishideo Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanjee Mushar Vs The State of Bihar

Narmadeshwar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Yadav @ Shashi Kumar @ Guddu Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar @ Babloo Vs The State of Bihar