Allowed

Raja Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jun 2020CR. MISC./7787/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal matter under the Arms Act involving possession of a pistol and live cartridges, the Court granted bail to the petitioner pending restoration of normalcy due to the COVID-19 pandemic, directing surrender of formal bonds within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on personal bond. Directs to furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties within four weeks after normalcy is restored.

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7787 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2019 Thana- NALANDA District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJA KUMAR Son of Viyadar Ravidas Resident of Village-Murarpur, P.OBiharsharif, P.S.-Laheri, Bihar, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanchay Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 08-06-2020

¶13

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶14

taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶15

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1-B)A and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶18

Allegation is that one country made pistol along with ten live cartridges are recovered.

¶19

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05.10.2019. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. One country made

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7787 of 2020(3) dt.08-06-2020 2/2

¶21

pistol along with ten live cartridges are said to have been recovered. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶22

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nalanda in connection with Nalanda P.S. case No.148 of 2019.

¶24

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of four weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶25

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶26

Narendra/-

¶27

U T

Raja Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gunja Kumari @ Juli @ Shivani Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Naushad Vs The State of Bihar

Vinesh Tudu @ Binesh Tudu Vs the State of Bihar

Prince Kumar @ Sahil Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Somiya Vs The State of Bihar

Katik Tuddu @ Gopin Tuddu Vs The State of Bihar