Allowed

Gunja Kumari @ Juli @ Shivani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jun 2020CR. MISC./6967/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A bail petition was allowed in a case involving offences under the IPC and Arms Act. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioner was granted temporary release on a personal bond until normalcy is restored and required to furnish security and sureties within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on personal bond pending furnishing of Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties within four weeks after normalcy.

Gunja Kumari @ Juli @ Shivani Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6967 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-754 Year-2019 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

GUNJA KUMARI @ JULI @ SHIVANI D/o Karu Manjhi Resident of Village-Bharosa, P.O-Orna, P.S-Muffacil, District-Nawada (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 05-06-2020

¶15

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶16

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶18

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶19

The prosecution case in short is that the accused persons hatched conspiracy and came to the repairing shop of the brother of the informant and fired at him due to which he died.

¶20

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6967 of 2020(4) dt.05-06-2020 2/2

¶22

the petitioner is in custody since 2.8.2019 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion Except for suspicion, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest his implication in the present case.

¶23

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶24

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on her personal bond to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1 Danapur, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 754/2019.

¶25

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of four weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

Pankaj/-

¶28

U T

Gunja Kumari @ Juli @ Shivani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gunja Kumari @ Juli @ Shivani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kishore Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Murari Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Naushad Vs The State of Bihar

Vinesh Tudu @ Binesh Tudu Vs the State of Bihar

Birchand Mahto @ Virendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar