Allowed

Md. Naushad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jun 2020CR. MISC./6871/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving theft of railway property. The bail was secured via personal bond due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with a direction to furnish the standard bond with sureties when normalcy is restored.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on personal bond; directed to furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within four weeks upon normalcy.

Md. Naushad Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6871 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA RPF/POST District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. NAUSHAD S/O Md. Istayaque Alam R/o Village - Obra, P.S. - Obra, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sudhir Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 05-06-2020

¶15

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶16

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶18

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 3 of RP (UP) Act.

¶19

The prosecution case in short is that the accused persons have stolen computers and printers belonging to the railway.

¶20

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2019 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6871 of 2020(3) dt.05-06-2020 2/2

¶22

witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Prosecution report has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner had no knowledge that the computers and other accessories of the computers kept in the car were railway properties. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶24

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya RPF Post P.S. Case No. 26/2019.

¶25

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of four weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

Pankaj/-

¶28

U T

Md. Naushad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Naushad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kishore Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Murari Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Gunja Kumari @ Juli @ Shivani Vs The State of Bihar

Vinesh Tudu @ Binesh Tudu Vs the State of Bihar

Birchand Mahto @ Virendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar