Allowed

Suphal Soren @ Supal Soren v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jun 2020CR. MISC./63950/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under IPC and Arms Act. The court accepted submissions regarding co-accused bail and lack of trial conclusion timeline, ordering release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Suphal Soren @ Supal Soren Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63950 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2018 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Suphal Soren @ Supal Soren Son of Late Bindeshwari Soren Resident of Village - Tetrahi, P.S.- Jankinagar, District - Purnia

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : M/s N.K.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Kumar Praveen, Preety Kunwar For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

4 03-06-2020

¶9

Heard Mr. N.K.Agrawal, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Ms. Anita Kumari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

¶10

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 154/2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶11

Earlier, prayer of bail of the petitioner was rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.9.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53167 of 2018 but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the name of this petitioner came in confessional statement of co-accused Vijay Marandi, who has already been granted privilege of bail and except the petitioner,

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63950 of 2019(4) dt.03-06-2020 2/2

¶13

almost all the co-accused have been released on bail. He, further, submits that except the confessional statement of coaccused Vijay Marandi, there appears to be nothing against the petitioner, who is languishing in jail custody since 13.3.2018 and in view of the letter No. 2/2020 dated 22.01.2020 of learned trial court, it would appear that there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial of the petitioner in near future.

¶14

Although, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer but considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, 4^th , Araria/concerned court in connection with Sessions Trial No. 235/2018 arising out of Forbesgunj P.S. Case No. 154/2018.

¶15

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶16

Spd/-

¶17

U T

Suphal Soren @ Supal Soren v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suphal Soren @ Supal Soren v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golu Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Shri Ram Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Haidar @ Haidar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Tilak Kumar @ Tilakana Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Arman Vs The State of Bihar