Allowed

Arman v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jun 2020CR. MISC./63765/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in jail custody for an offence under Section 365 IPC. The petitioner was not named in the FIR, and the court noted lack of evidence against him aside from a tainted confessional statement regarding the killing of a deceased person.

What did the court decide?

Relief granted: Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Arman Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63765 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2019 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arman Son of Md. Islam Resident of Village - Dumari, P.S.- Chakand, District- Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Avinash Singh Parmar, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar No. 2, Adv. For the State : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. For the Informant Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶8

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 03-06-2020

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant through video conferencing.

¶12

Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 17.06.2019 in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 241 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Petitioner is not named in the first information report but in course of investigation, allegedly, mobile phone of the deceased was recovered from possession of co-accused Jawed, who disclosed that he had purchased the said mobile from the petitioner. Subsequently, petitioner was arrested and confessed

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63765 of 2019(5) dt.03-06-2020 2/2

¶15

his guilt.

¶16

However, learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that in his confessional statement, petitioner confessed this fact that he as well as co-accused had killed the deceased at the direction of husband of the deceased.

¶17

Taking note of this fact that except so-called confessional statement, that too, before the police, there appears to be nothing against the petitioner, against whom the investigation has already been completed, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 241 of 2019.

¶18

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶19

shahzad/-

¶20

U T

Arman v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arman v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golu Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Shri Ram Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Haidar @ Haidar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Tilak Kumar @ Tilakana Vs The State of Bihar

Suphal Soren @ Supal Soren Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Raj Vs The State of Bihar