Allowed

Vikash Sahani @ Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2020CR. MISC./394/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under sections of the IPC and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The order was based on the fact that recovery was not made from his possession and he had no criminal antecedents, directing his release within four weeks of arrest or surrender subject to bail bonds and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties and compliance with Section 438(2) CrPC con

Vikash Sahani @ Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.394 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2019 Thana- PIYAR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIKASH SAHANI @ VIKASH KUMAR Son of Chhatu Sahani Resident of Village - Sakriman, P.S.- Piar, District- Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nitu Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Khurshid Anwar ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 21-01-2020

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Piar (Hatha O.P) P.S. Case No. 228 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged recoveries were from other persons and not from the present petitioner.

¶14

Considering the fact that the recoveries were not made from the conscious possession of the petitioner and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.394 of 2020(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2

¶16

court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzuffarpur in connection with Piar (Hatha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 228 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶17

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶18

Jagdish/-

¶19

U T

Vikash Sahani @ Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Sahani @ Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hare Ram Sah @ Bengali Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anup Das @ Anup Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Briksha Das Vs The State of Bihar