Allowed

Kishore Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jan 2020CR. MISC./3382/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner in a dowry death case involving Sections 304(B), 302, and 34 IPC. The court was satisfied regarding false implication, clean antecedents, and the petitioner's lack of complicity as the murdered woman's elder brother-in-law.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be enlarged on regular bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Kishore Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3382 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2019 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KISHORE KUMAR Son of Late Shukul Prasad Resident of Village - Bikram, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anurag Saurav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 20-01-2020

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 296 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The allegation is regarding the accused persons having killed the deceased victim lady on account of nonfulfillment of demand for dowry.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is having a clean antecedent and is languishing in custody since 08.09.2019. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner is the elder brother-in-law of the deceased victim lady and is living separately, hence he has got

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3382 of 2020(2) dt.20-01-2020 2/2

¶16

no complicity in the matter and the husband of the deceased victim lady is in custody.

¶17

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, coupled with the fact that the petitioner is the elder brother-in-law of the deceased victim lady and he has no complicity in the matter, I deem it fit and proper to direct for release of the petitioner on regular bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. VI, Danapur in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 296 of 2019.

¶19

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶20

Tiwary/-

¶21

U T

Kishore Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishore Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Devdut Kumar @ Devdatt Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Champa Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Kavindra Kohar @ Kavindra Kumhar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Subhan Mian @ Md. Subhan @ Subhan Vs the State of Bihar