Allowed

Mokhtar Ansari v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Dec 2020CR. MISC./31319/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under multiple sections of the IPC in a murder and riot case. The court noted the petitioner had been in custody since March 2019 and a previous bail order had granted liberty to renew the prayer. Bail was allowed with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 447 of 2019 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties.

Mokhtar Ansari Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 31319 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2019 Thana- Taraiya District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mokhtar Ansari, age 61 years male, son of late Jainuddin Ansari, Resident of village Mukundpur, P.S. Taraiya, Distt. Saran at Chapra

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

2 03-12-2020

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned APP for the State, through video conferencing.

¶12

The petitioner has filed the instant application for

¶13

grant of regular bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 84 of 2019 registered for the offence under sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 307, 341, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner and two other persons are stated to have assaulted the brothers of the informant with iron rod and lathi.

¶15

It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner that the earlier application for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 20.11.2019 (Annexure1) passed in Cr. Misc. No. 73768 of 2019, however giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15087 of 2020(5) dt.01-12-2020 2/2

¶17

months. It is submitted that more than one year has passed since passing of the said order and the petitioner is in custody since 24.3.2019.

¶18

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner together with the petitioner being in custody since 24.3.2019 and the liberty granted by the aforesaid order dated 20.11.2019, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 447 of 2019 (arising out of Taraiya P.S. Case No. 84 of 2019) on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional District and Sessions Judge-V, Saran at Chapra.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Sushma/- U T

Mokhtar Ansari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mokhtar Ansari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagarnath Ray @ Jagarnath Kumar Ray @ Jagannath Ray @ Jagarnath Kumar @ Jagnaath Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Bipat @ Rajesh Mehta @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Tufail Vs The State of Bihar

Satyam Jha @ Satyam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar @ Golu Thakur @ Jitendra Thakur Vs The State of Bihar