Allowed

Satyam Jha @ Satyam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Dec 2020CR. MISC./29920/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 392 IPC, the Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's petition and directed his enlargement on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, considering the co-accused were already on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail in connection with PS. Case No. 227 of 2018 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Satyam Jha @ Satyam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar Jha Vs The State of… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29920 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2018 Thana- SINGHESHWAR District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SATYAM JHA @ SATYAM KUMAR @ SATYAM KUMAR JHA S/o Pawan Kumar Jha @ Pawan Jha Resident of Village-Kayasth Tola, Ward No.29, P.S. and District-Saharsa.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 03-12-2020

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case no. 227 of 2018 registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant was returning on his motorcycle, three accused persons overtook him and on the point of pistol dispossessed him of his valuables.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR was registered against unknown. The name of the petitioner transpired in course of investigation on the confessional statement of co-accused made before the police. It is submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the case of the petitioner stands on a similar footing to that of co-accused Monu Singh who has been enlarged on bail by order dated 20.10.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 27013 of 2020. The petitioner is in

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29920 of 2020(3) dt.03-12-2020 2/2

¶17

custody since 22.7.2019.

¶18

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

¶19

for the State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner together with the petitioner being in custody since 22.7.2019 and grant of bail to the co-accused, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case no. 227 of 2018 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura.

¶21

Prakash/-

¶22

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶23

Satyam Jha @ Satyam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyam Jha @ Satyam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagarnath Ray @ Jagarnath Kumar Ray @ Jagannath Ray @ Jagarnath Kumar @ Jagnaath Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Bipat @ Rajesh Mehta @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Tufail Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar @ Golu Thakur @ Jitendra Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Mokhtar Ansari Vs the State of Bihar