Allowed

Rajesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Dec 2020CR. MISC./27683/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was filed by the petitioner in PS Case No. 82/2020 under Sections 366 and 363A IPC, alleging false kidnapping charges following a misunderstanding. The Court, noting the investigation concluded and no antecedents, enlarged him on bail.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was enlarged on bail to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 27683 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2020 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajesh Kumar S/o Sadhu Saran Prasad @ Saryu Sharan Prasad Resident of Village-Makhdumpur, P.S-Ben, District-Nalanda.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. Mr. Dilip Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ajit Kumar, APP For the informant : Smt. Kiran Kumari, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶6

ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 02-12-2020

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP

¶9

for the State and learned counsel for the informant through video conferencing.

¶10

The instant application for regular bail has been filed by the petitioner in connection with Ishlampur P.S. Case No.82 of 2020 registered under sections 366 and 363A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner was caught making an attempt of kidnapping the two and half years old child of the informant. He was beaten up and on enquiry disclosed his name as Rajesh Kumar.

¶12

It is submitted by the petitioner that the allegation as levelled in the F.I.R. are false and concocted. It is submitted that while he was trying to assist the child who was asking to return

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 27683 of 2020(3) dt.02-12-2020 2/2

¶14

home, under mistaken fact by the persons present, he was understood to be a kidnapper and assaulted. It is submitted that he is in custody since 11.2.2020 and besides one other case under the Excise Act which was also instituted on the same date, he has no other criminal antecedent. Investigation in the case has concluded.

¶15

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant has also appeared. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the misunderstanding between the parties, has been removed.

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf petitioner together with the petitioner being in custody since 11.2.2020, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Ishlampur P.S. Case No.82 of 2020 on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Civil Court, Hilsa, Nalanda.

¶17

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶18

Bibhash/- U T

Rajesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kallu Khan @ Firoj Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Brijesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Jagarnath Ray @ Jagarnath Kumar Ray @ Jagannath Ray @ Jagarnath Kumar @ Jagnaath Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Bipat @ Rajesh Mehta @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar