Allowed

Ramchandra Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jan 2020CR. MISC./2916/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing application for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged forgery of TET certificates. This Court allowed the application, directing the petitioners to appear for investigation if arrested within six weeks, with bail bonds subject to cancellation for non-cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; petitioners to be released on bail if arrested or surrender within six weeks, on condition of appearing before I.O. within ten days of release.

Ramchandra Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2916 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2019 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramchandra Ram, Son of Kapildeo Ram Resident of Village - Baidnathpur, P.S.- Chiraiya, District- East Champaran

¶5

Rajesh Kumar, Son of Sudama Ram Resident of Village - Baidnathpur, P.S.Chiraiya, District- East Champaran

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Mishra ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 24-01-2020

¶10

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Kotwa P. S. Case No. 227 of 2019 disclosing offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 34 of IPC.

¶11

Petitioners are said to have appointed on the forged TET Certificate and Block Education Officer has issued a letter against the petitioners to lodge an F.I.R.

¶12

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the above letters issued by the Block Education Officer is itself forged that has been considered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, which will appear from Annexure 3 series and coaccused persons have also been granted bail, which will appear from Annexure 2 and 3 series.

¶13

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2916 of 2020(2) dt.24-01-2020 2/2

¶15

Having heard both sides, considering the above submissions, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail to the satisfaction of the concerned court with condition that within ten days of his release, he has to appear before the I.O. and cooperate in the investigation, otherwise, prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶16

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶17

Sunil Shukla/-

¶18

U T

Ramchandra Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramchandra Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Noor Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amrita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Birbal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pratima Kumari @ Pratima Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Pinki Devi @ Pinki Kumari Vs The State of Bihar