Allowed

Arjun Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Dec 2020CR. MISC./22307/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court at Patna released the petitioner on regular bail subject to furnishing a bond with sureties, compliance with trial attendance, and staying abroad without permission, noting the petitioner's clean antecedents and custody duration.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions of residence, cooperation, and no travel abroad.

Arjun Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22307 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2019 Thana- District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ARJUN CHAUDHARY S/o- Shambhu Chaudhary R/o- Gopalpur, Ghisu Tola, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Sahebganj.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 07-12-2020

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 137 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 354(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the coaccused having more or less similar allegation has already been granted regular bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 81511 of 2019 and the case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 10.08.2019. Hence, the petitioner

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22307 of 2020(6) dt.07-12-2020 2/2

¶17

may be enlarged on regular bail.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Katihar in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 137 of 2019, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the petitioner shall fully co-operate wit the trial of the case as well as the petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned Trial Court, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶19

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶20

brajesh/-

¶21

U T

Arjun Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghunath Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kail Prajapati @ Akash Jee @ Kail Prajapat Vs The State of Bihar

Ekram @ Sanichara @ Md. Ekram @ Aikram Vs the State of Bihar

Ajeet Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sharwan Kumar @ Sharwan Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar