Allowed

Kail Prajapati @ Akash Jee @ Kail Prajapat v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2020CR. MISC./28064/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner in connection with a case under Section 148 IPC and other offences. The petitioner had been in custody since March 2018. The court imposed a condition requiring at least one surety to be a close relative.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on regular bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties (one being a close relative filin affidavit).

Kail Prajapati @ Akash Jee @ Kail Prajapat Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28064 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2011 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KAIL PRAJAPATI @ AKASH JEE @ KAIL PRAJAPAT Son of Indradev Prajapati Resident of Village- Ajan, P.S.- Goh, Distt- Aurangabad.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-12-2020

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 132 of 2011 (G.R. No. 4356 of 2011) for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341 and 435 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act and 13, 16, 18, 20 of U.A.P.A. Act

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the co-accused having more or less similar allegation has already been granted regular bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 5111 of 2013, Cr. Misc. No. 11119 of 2014 and Cr. Misc. No. 9691 of 2014 and the case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28064 of 2020(2) dt.04-12-2020 2/2

¶16

22.03.2018. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on regular bail.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -III, Gaya in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 132 of 2011 (G.R. No. 4356 of 2011) subject to the conditions that out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶18

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶19

brajesh/- U T

Kail Prajapati @ Akash Jee @ Kail Prajapat v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kail Prajapati @ Akash Jee @ Kail Prajapat v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mazid @ Md. Mazid Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Dinesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Irshad @ Irshad Alam @ Md. Irshad Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Raghunath Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar @ Saurav Kumar Vs The State of Bihar