Allowed

Mukesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2020CR. MISC./24956/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge oral order from the Patna High Court granting bail to three petitioners in connection with a police station case involving offences under Sections 302/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The court relied on clean antecedents and abuse of process allegations to order release on personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing personal bond to satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Gaya. Case remanded.

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24956 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2020 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH KUMAR S/o Mohan Singh @ Man Mohan Singh Resident of Village- Jaitiya, P.S.- Charki, District- Gaya.

¶5

Jitesh Kumar S/o Mohan Singh @ Man Mohan Singh Resident of VillageJaitiya, P.S.- Charki, District- Gaya.

¶6

Nitesh Kumar S/o Sikandar Singh @ Sidhnath Singh Resident of VillageJaitiya, P.S.- Charki, District- Gaya.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshmudin, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 04-12-2020

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶15

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 77 of 2020 for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, are innocent and have not committed any offence. In fact, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and no specific allegation is attributed to them

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24956 of 2020(3) dt.04-12-2020 2/2

¶19

rather the specific allegation of assault is attributed to the co-accused Guddu Singh. Moreover, there is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioners are rotting in judicial custody since 23.05.2020.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Gaya in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 77 of 2020.

¶21

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶22

brajesh/-

¶23

U T

Mukesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mazid @ Md. Mazid Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Dinesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Irshad @ Irshad Alam @ Md. Irshad Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Raghunath Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Kail Prajapati @ Akash Jee @ Kail Prajapat Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar @ Saurav Kumar Vs The State of Bihar