Allowed

Bittu @ Bittu Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jun 2020CR. MISC./15540/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehended arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, observing a lack of direct material against his involvement despite his being named as a criminal associate.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC and full cooperation with investigation.

Bittu @ Bittu Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15540 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-554 Year-2019 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BITTU @ BITTU KUMAR @ SANJIV KUMAR Son of Binod Kumar Resident of Durbhasha Bhawan, Ashok Puri, Near Shiv Mandir, Khajpura, Rukanpura, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, Distt - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Ranjan, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 11-06-2020 The matter has been taken up through video conferencing.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,2016.

¶13

No recovery of liquor is alleged from the possession or house of the petitioner rather the co-accused, from whose possession liquor was recovered, named the petitioner as his criminal associate. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

¶14

Since there is no direct material against the petitioner’s involvement, let the petitioner, above named, in the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15540 of 2020(2) dt.11-06-2020 2/2

¶16

event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000 (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Rupaspur P.S.Case No.554 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶17

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶18

Nitesh/-

¶19

U T

Bittu @ Bittu Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bittu @ Bittu Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bhikhar Rai @ Bhikhari Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar @ Nishant Kumar @ Amit Singh @ Nishant Vs the State of Bihar

Suren Sardar @ Surendra Sardar Vs the State of Bihar

Moulvi Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Nirbhay Kumar Singh @ Lala Singh @ Lal Singh Vs The State of Bihar