The High Court of Patna heard an anticipatory bail application. It was informed that the petitioner had already been arrested, rendering the prayer infructuous. The application was dismissed accordingly.
Prayer for anticipatory bail dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15407 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-378 Year-2019 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran
======================================================
MOULVI RAI, Son of Omprakash Rai, Resident of Village - Semaria Durga Asthan, P.S. - Revelganj, Distt - Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pronoti Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 11-06-2020
The matter has been taken up through Video
Conferencing.
Mr. Pronoti Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State is present.
It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already been arrested in this case, hence, his prayer for anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, it stands dismissed as infructuous in connection with Revilganj Police Station Case No. 378 of 2019 pending in the Court of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judgecum-Special Judge (Excise), Saran/successor Court.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Kundan/-
U T
MOULVI RAI
The State of Bihar
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
