Allowed

Dheeraj Kumar Akela @ Dheeraj Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2020CR. MISC./11660/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in a case involving alleged cheating and theft. The court granted bail subject to conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C., requiring a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Dheeraj Kumar Akela @ Dheeraj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11660 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-479 Year-2019 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dheeraj Kumar Akela @ Dheeraj Kumar Son of Mahavir Lal Gupta Resident of Mohalla - Bharao Par, P.S.- Laheri, Dist.- Nalanda, at Present Flat No.501, Twin Tower, South Gandhi Maidan, Maurya Hotel, Bankipur, Exhibition Road, P.S.-Gandhi Maidan,Distt-Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikramdeo Singh Mr.Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶7

01-07-2020

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶9

learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing.

¶10

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Laheri P.S. Case No. 479 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

As per F.I.R., the allegation against the petitioner is that he received a parcel containing mobile phone etc. in the name of other person namely Ravi Shankar and thereafter, he returned the parcel to the Delivery boy, who is informant, by saying that it be delivered to Ravi Shankar. Later on, it revealed that petitioner has changed the mobile phone of the parcel.

¶12

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11660 of 2020(2) dt.01-07-2020 2/2

¶14

innocent and has committed no offence. The allegation, levelled against him in the FIR, is out-and-out false and concocted. It is further submitted that petitioner was not present on the date of occurrence, rather he was in Patna and under-going treatment, as per medical prescription annexed as Annexure – 2. In fact, the informant, who is delivery boy, has cooked up a false story. The petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail application is allowed.

¶16

In the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 479 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶17

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)

¶18

anay

Dheeraj Kumar Akela @ Dheeraj Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dheeraj Kumar Akela @ Dheeraj Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanchan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Babita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Raja @ Mohammed Raja Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Dhaneshwar Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Aklesh Rajbhar Vs The State of Bihar