The High Court at Patna held the miscellaneous application as infructuous based on the counsel's submission without providing substantive reasoning or abstracting a legal principle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.629 of 2017
======================================================
Md. Zahid Hussain Son of Md. Shahabuddin, Resident of village - Bhwalpur Bhalua , P.O. Agni, P.S. Belaganj, Distt. - Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabeen Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma - AAG- 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 2 24-01-2019 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the present application has lost its utility and it has become infructuous.
The application is, accordingly, disposed of as
infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Md. Zahid Hussain
Kumar Ravi
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
