Counsel for the petitioner admitted compliance with the order of the writ court. Consequently, the pending miscellaneous proceeding was dropped and disposed of.
Dropped the proceeding and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4293 of 2016 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8684 of 2015
======================================================
Sheo Kumar Sharma S/o Late Mogal Sharma, Resident of Village- Birpur, P.S.- Birpur, District- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Aag15 Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
4 02-04-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the
order of the writ court has been complied with.
In view of the above, the present proceeding is
dropped and the application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Sheo Kumar Sharma
The State Of Bihar
Sri R.K. Mahajan
Sri M. Ramchandrudu
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
