The Patna High Court dropped the present proceeding after considering the show cause filed by the opposite parties, leaving the petitioner to pursue remedies before the Department.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3697 of 2017 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18654 of 2008
======================================================
Sanjay Dom @ Sanjay Kumar Dom son of Mokami Dom @ Motami Dom, resident of Harish Chandra Stadium Nawada, PS Nawada, District Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.S.D. Yadav AAG 9
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
Considering the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties the Court does not feel inclined to proceed any further in the matter.
The present proceeding is accordingly dropped and the application stands disposed of.
However, disposal of the present proceeding will not preclude the petitioner in pursuing his remedy before the Department and the Department is supposed to take care of the claim of the petitioner and accommodate him on the post if any
Patna High Court MJC No.3697 of 2017(4) dt.01-04-2019 2/2
vacancy exists still now.
With the aforesaid, this application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
mrl./-
U
Sanjay Dom @ Sanjay Kumar Dom
The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh
Mr. Kaushal Kumar
Mr. Srinath Prasad
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
