Miscellaneous application regarding a writ petition was disposed of by the Hon'ble High Court at Patna as infructuous. The learned Single Judge terminated the matter without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3633 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1543 of 2014
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.A.B. Ojha, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha – Sc For Railway : Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
submits that the present application has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the application stands disposed
of as infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U
Nandlal and Anr
The Union Of India
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
