The petitioner filed a contempt petition against opposite parties for willful disobedience of a Court order. The court found that the order was complied with, accepted by the petitioner, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3701 of 2016 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7565 of 2016
======================================================
M/s Lakchmi Saw through it’s Proprietor Lakchami Saw son of late Nageshwar Sao resident of village - Jindapur, P.S. - Magadh University, District - Gaya.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Parties: Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 25-04-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.
Patna High Court MJC No.3701 of 2016 dt.25-04-2019 2/2
stand of the opposite parties.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date | 29.04.2019 |
| Transmission Date | N.A. |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petitioner is entitled to initiate contempt proceedings when the order under impugned is already complied with.
M/s Lakchmi Saw through Proprietor Lakchami Saw
The State Of Bihar
Mr. Kumar Ravi
Mr. Vikash Kumar Jaiswal
Mr. Jay Jay Ram Paswan
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
