Petitioner admitted compliance with a previous court order. The application was disposed of without any substantive legal reasoning or final decision details in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3300 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9051 of 2013
======================================================
Rajmani Prasad S/O Late Yadunandan Prasad Resident Of Village- Nirpur, P.S- Nalanda, District- Nalanda, At Present Posted As Village- Extension Worker (V.E.W), Sub- Divisional Agricultural Office (Extension), Hilsa, Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar No.1 For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ga3 Subhash Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 07-01-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the
order of the Court has been complied with.
In view of the above, the present application stands
disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U
Rajmani Prasad
The State of Bihar
Binay Kumar
Dr. Thiyag Rajan SM
Kundan Kumar
Sanjay Kumar Sinha
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
