Petitioner represented counsel stated no instruction was received. Opposing counsel noted writ direction compliance. Court disposed of miscellaneous jurisdiction petition as not pressed.
Petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.368 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16463 of 2009
======================================================
PRAVEEN KUMAR, son of Shri Durga Prasad Sah, resident of Village Milki Police- Station Mirganj District Purnea………………...... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vikram Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ramadhar Singh, G.P.25 : Mr. Upendra Prasad Singh, AC to G.P. 25
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 04-01-2019 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that he has no instruction in the matter. In the above circumstance, he submits that he is not pressing the present matter.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party submits that the direction of the Writ Court has already been complied with.
Considering the totality of the facts situation, the instant petition is disposed of as not pressed.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
T.Kr./-
U
Praveen Kumar
The State of Bihar
Pankaj Kumar Pal
Pawan Kr. Mandal
Nawal Kishore Thakur
Sudha Devi
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
