Petitioner admitted compliance with earlier direction. Court declared application infructuous and disposed of it.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1984 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13291 of 2012
======================================================
Baban Kumar Pandey & Anr Lalan Pandey udhadiabn, P.S. Sultanganj District Bhagalpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Gp32 Harish Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
3 04-01-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the
direction issued by this Court has been complied with.
In view of the above, the present application has
become infructuous and it is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
mdrashid/-
U
Baban Kumar Pandey & Anr
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
