Oral order disposing of a writ petition and contempt application. The court refused further indulgence but granted liberty to challenge an office order dated 12.09.2018 before the appropriate forum.
Liberty granted to challenge an office order dated 12.09.2018 before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2538 of 2016 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10298 of 2010
======================================================
Kauleshwar Paswan son of Late Gulela Paswan, Resident of Village- Narauli, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad son of not known, The Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. B.J. Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
6 21-01-2019
Having regard to the scope of contempt jurisdiction, the Court is not inclined to give any further indulgence. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the office order dated 12.09.2018, Annexure-E to the supplementary show cause before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Kauleshwar Paswan
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
