This order disposed of a contempt application filed by the petitioner. The High Court found that the directions issued in the underlying writ petition had been complied with based on the facts on record, and thus no order was deemed necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1575 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5599 of 2017
======================================================
Shaista Praween @ Shaishta Praween
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Through Sri Chaitanya Prasad, Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department,
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Subhash Prasad Singh G A 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
3 12-12-2019 This application has been preferred praying inter alia for the following relief/s:
“for initiating a contempt proceeding against the respondents for willfully violation and disobedience of judgment and order dated 19/05/2017j passed by Hon’ble The Chief Justice Mr. Rajendra Menon and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh in C.W.J.C. No.5599/2017 (Shaista Praween Vs. The State of Bihar and others) by which the writ application filed by the petitioner has been allowed with a direction that if there is encroachment in the area and in spite of Annexure-6 the competent authority has not taken any action, the petitioner should file a properly constituted complaint before the competent statutory authority, namely
Patna High Court MJC No.1575 of 2018(3) dt.12-12-2019 2/2
respondent no.-7 under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act and it would be for the competent statutory authority to take action for removal of the encroachment after following the due process of law as contemplated under the statute within six months from the date of filing of the complaint and with observation the writ petition has disposed of.”
In view of Annexure-B, the directions contained in the
order stands complied with.
The petition is disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
K.C.Jha/-
U
Shaista Praween @ Shaishta Praween
The State Of Bihar
Sanjay Karol
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
