The High Court at Patna dismissed a writ petition concerning the merger of Allahabad Bank and Indian Bank. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner, an advocate, and the case was disposed of accordingly.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24737 of 2019
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D.Sanjay, (ADSG) Mr. R. K. Sharma, CGC
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 12-12-2019 Petitioners have prayed for the following relief:-
“For directing and commanding the respondents to reconsider the merger of Allahabad Bank with Indian Bank because the size of Allahabad Bank is bigger than Indian Bank in almost every aspects.”
Not finding favour with the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners finding the Court to dismiss the writ
Patna High Court CWJC No.24737 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2019 2/2
petition, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the same. Indulgently, for the reason that the petitioner no.1 Sudhir Kumar Ojha @ Sudhir Kumar is a practising advocate and has realized his mistake, we allow the same.
The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Sunil/-
U
Sudhir Kumar Ojha
Jitendra Kumar Mishra
The Union of India
The Managing Director, Allahabad Bank
Chief Justice
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
