granted in favour of petitioner. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that initially the licence of the petitioner was cancelled vide order dated 25.11.2004 on the ground that he has shifted the place of Saw Mill from village Sapha to Baidyanathpur. He further points out that prior to passing of the order dated 25.11.2004 a verification enquiry has been done by the Range Officer and a detailed report has been submitted vide letter no. 42 dated 22.02.2004 before the respondent Divisional Forest Officer as contained in Annexure-1 to this application, wherein it is mentioned that the place of Saw Mill was never changed and in the records the place of running of Mill was mentioned as Baidyanathpur, P.S. Sour Bazar, District Saharsa. Learned counsel further submits that original Court i.e. Divisional Forest Officer while passing the initial order dated 25.11.2004 as well as the appellate court while passing order dated 21.1.2006 did not take into consideration the aforesaid report of Range Officer as contained in Annexure-1. The petitioner has filed the writ petition being C.W.J.C. No. 2072 of 2010 before this Hon’ble Court challenging both the aforesaid order(s). The Hon’ble Court , after looking into the aforesaid enquiry report submitted by Range Officer, became satisfied that Saw Mill has not been shifted, to Sapha from Baidyanathpur. The residential address of the petitioner was mentioned as Sapha in the license. The Saw Mill
