Mamta Devi v. The Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In an oral order, the High Court granted permission to the petitioners to withdraw the writ application, thereby dismissing the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4846 of 2019
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
... ... Respondents
| ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Verma, Advocate ====================================================== |
|---|
| CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER |
to withdraw this writ application.
Permission is granted.
This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Rajeev/-
U
Mamta Devi
Punita Kumari
The Union of India
Superintendent of Post Office, Bhagalpur Division
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court