Disposed

Sanjeev Kumar v. The Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Patna HC23 Jul 2019CWJC/3572/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner claimed compensation for land utilized by respondents. Respondents counsel advised raising claim under Indian Telegraph Act. Petitioner relied on SC precedent. Writ pending civil application disposed accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed off accordingly; claim for compensation directed to be raised under Section 16 Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 before District Judge.

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. and… — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3572 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sanjeev Kumar, son of Late Mundrika Singh Resident of Mohalla- Bhabha Colony, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, Police Station- Kankarbagh, DistrictPatna

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. and Ors through its Chairman-cumManaging Director, Resident of Mohalla- Vidut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Patna

¶7

The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Resident of Mohalla- Vidut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Patna

¶8

The Executive Electric Engineer, Planning PESU East, R. Block, Police Station- Sachivalaya, District- Patna

¶9

The Director Magistrate, Collectoriate, North Gandhi Maidan, Police Station- Pirbahore, District- Patna.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Alias Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kinkar Kumar (Sc8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 23-07-2019

¶13

In view of the stand taken by the respondent no.3 in

¶14

the second supplementary counter affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would make an alternative submission whereunder the petitioner should be compensated for the area of land belonging to him which has been utilized by the respondents.

¶15

Learned counsel for the Power Company submits that the petitioner may raise his claims towards compensation for the said land, if so advised, before the learned District Judge in accordance with Section 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885.

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.3572 of 2019(4) dt.23-07-2019 2/2

¶17

He has also relied upon a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Power Grid Corporation of India Limited vs. Century Textiles & Industries Limited and Ors. reported in 2017(2) PLJR 152(SC).

¶18

This writ application stands disposed off accordingly.

¶19

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶20

arvind/-

¶21

Sanjeev Kumar v. The Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar v. The Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hiralal Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Navin Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Marketing Vs Dena Bank through its Zonal Manager, patna And Ors.

Mamta Devi Vs The Union of India and Ors.

Vijeta and Anr. Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Arbind Kumar Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors.