Disposed

Arbind Kumar Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.

Patna HC23 Jul 2019CWJC/4636/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Petitioner approached the High Court seeking a direction to the Respondents to verify his claims for supplies of paper and laser jet items and to pay the admitted bill amount and security deposit. The Court directed the Assistant General Manager to verify the claims and, if genuine, make payment within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 to verify claims regarding supplies of paper and laser jet items, and to pay admitted bills/security deposit within two months if genuine; otherwise, provide reasons.

Arbind Kumar Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors. — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4636 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Arbind Kumar Sharma S/o Late Surya Deo Rai Proprietor of Laxmi Enterprises, District Board Campus, Station Road Muzaffarpur P.S. Town Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA through the General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, General Manager Telecom District- Muzaffarpur.

¶7

Assistant General Manager (Adm. and Planning) B.S.N.L., GMTD, Muzaffarpur.

¶8

S.D.E.(Planning) B.S.N.L., GMTD, Muzaffarpur.

¶9

Accounts Officer (Cash) B.S.N.L., GMTD, Muzaffarpur.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajiv Kumar, Adv. For the BSNL : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, Adv. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 23-07-2019 Petitioner in the present case is seeking a direction to the respondents to make payment of admitted bill amount and the security deposit. It is the case of the petitioner that he had got the supply order to supply A-4 size paper and 7 items of different size of laser jet at the given rate as disclosed in paragraph 5 of the writ application. He claims to have supplied the aforesaid items in the office of the respondent no.2 and submitted his bills (Annexure-4 and 5).

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondent BSNL is present and submits that the grievance of the petitioner is being looked into and steps will be taken to consider the same and to pay the

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.4636 of 2019(2) dt.23-07-2019 2/2

¶16

admitted amount if any payable to the petitioner.

¶17

In the given facts and circumstances of the case, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioner, verify the assertions of the petitioner in the writ application regarding the supplies claims to have made by him and in case it is found that the claim of the petitioner is genuine, steps be taken to make payment of the admitted amount of his bills within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In case the claim of the petitioner is not admitted either in whole or in part, the reasons thereof shall be provided to the petitioner within the same period.

¶18

This writ application stands disposed off accordingly.

¶19

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶20

arvind/-

¶21

Arbind Kumar Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Kumar Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hiralal Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Navin Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Marketing Vs Dena Bank through its Zonal Manager, patna And Ors.

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Mamta Devi Vs The Union of India and Ors.

Vijeta and Anr. Vs the Union of India and Ors.