The High Court of Patna, in a civil writ jurisdiction proceeding, dismissed the Writ petition with permission to withdraw. No substantive conclusion or principle of law is prescribed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4683 of 2019
======================================================
Anuj Kumar Singh S/o Late Hridayanand Singh Res. of Vill.- Chilahari, P.S.Dumraon, Distt.- Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vivek Prasad (Gp7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 08-04-2019 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner,
seeks permission to withdraw the present Writ petition.
Accordingly, the present Writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
T.Kr./-
U
Anuj Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
