Oral order dismissing a writ petition as the contrary party complied with the court's direction. The petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the decision in a separate proceeding.
Petitioning proceeding dropped; liberty granted to challenge opposite party decision in appropriate proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4122 of 2016 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17016 of 2011
======================================================
Nishant Kumar, s/o late Suresh Rai, resident of Village- Erazi Sahwazpur, Harouli, Yogipur, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, District- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Through Smt. Nilu Kumari, The Commandant, Bihar Military Police 7- Katihar, District- Katihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hemant Kumar Karan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG-3 Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
7 05-04-2019
Having regard to the fact that the opposite parties have passed order in compliance of the direction issued by the writ court, no further indulgence is required. The present proceeding is dropped and the application stands disposed of.
However, the petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the decision of the opposite parties in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Nishant Kumar
The State Of Bihar Through Smt. Nilu Kumari
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
