The High Court of Patna disposed of a miscellaneous application. The petitioner's counsel admitted compliance with the impugned order, leading the single judge to drop the proceeding and dismiss the application.
Proceeding dropped; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4059 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11967 of 2018
======================================================
Rishi Kumar Raj, Son of Late Chandra Bhushan Pathak, resident of VillageChesi, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A. R. Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
order of the Writ Court has been complied with.
In view of the above, the present proceeding is dropped. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
T.Kr./-
U
Rishi Kumar Raj
The State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
