The High Court disposed of the withdrawn writ application, granting liberty to the petitioner to ventilate grievances before the appropriate forum under the BIADA Regulations, 2007 within 30 days.
Withdrawal of writ application with liberty to approach the appropriate authority under BIADA Regulations, 2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4117 of 2019
======================================================
M/s Kanti Industries Factory No.-D-7, Industrial Area, Fatuha-803201, Patna, Bihar through one of its partners Shri Deepak Kumar, S/o Late Tarni Prasad Mandal, Resident of New Kadamkuan, p.s.-Kadamkuan, Patna
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Piyush Lal, Advocate For the BSFC : Mr.Raju Giri, Advocate Mr.Santosh Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3 16-07-2019 Having realized the difficulties in challenging the order of cancellation of allotment of plot dated 23.06.2007 and the appellate order dated 30.05.2011 because earlier challenge to those orders in C.W.J.C. No. 12550 of 2011 had been withdrawn, learned counsel for the petitioner submits at this stage that while withdrawing the writ application in C.W.J.C.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4117 of 2019(3) dt.16-07-2019 2/3
No. 12550 of 2011 the petitioner was granted liberty to ventilate his grievances against the respondent in accordance with law before appropriate forum/authority.
It is submitted that in view of the liberty available to the petitioner he had submitted his grievance before the Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (in short ‘BIADA’) which was considered but did not find favour with the Managing Director. It is stated that vide Annexure ‘P/11’ the Executive Director, BIADA has communicated the petitioner about the decision taken on his representation. Learned counsel submits that the reasons provided in the letter as contained in Annexure ‘P/11’ are now under challenge.
Mr. Piyush Lal, learned counsel representing the BIADA submits that so far as the earlier order of cancellation of allotment of plot and the appellate order refusing to interfere with the cancellation order are concerned, those have attained finality, however, in case the petitioner has any grievance with the reasons provided in Annexure ‘P/11’, he has a remedy available under the BIADA Regulations, 2007 to prefer an appeal before the Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4117 of 2019(3) dt.16-07-2019 3/3
In the aforesaid view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to avail his remedy before the appropriate authority in terms of BIADA Regulation, 2007 within a period of 30 days from today. In case the petitioner applies for the remedy under BIADA Regulation, 2007 before the appropriate authority, the same may be considered in accordance with law. All questions are left open.
This writ application is disposed off as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
ved/vats
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application should be disposed of after granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority under the BIADA Regulations, 2007.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Kanti Industries Factory No.-D-7
The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority
The Managing Director Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority
The Executive Director Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority
The Principal Secretary-cum-Appellate Authority Department of Industries
Bihar State Financial Corporation
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
