A writ petition seeking removal of encroachment on public land was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach authorities for redressal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25087 of 2019
======================================================
Jagarnath Mahto, Son of Late Kuldeep Mahto, Resident of MohallaChainpura, Police Station- Bypass, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
(i) For issuance of a direction to the respondent state authorities, i.e. respondent nos. 1 to 6 for removal of encroachment made by the private respondent i.e. respondent no.7 which is already declared as gairmazarua aam public land.
Patna High Court CWJC No.25087 of 2019(2) dt.13-12-2019 2/2
After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to approach the authorities concerned for redressal of his grievances in accordance with law.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Sunil/-
U
Jagarnath Mahto
State of Bihar
Om Prakash Singh
Sanjay Karol
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
